you know from first year calculus. In the context of multiple integral such a formula is usually called the transformation formula or the area formula for multiple integrals. Make sure you understand the ideas presented in this section. A similar procedure can be applied to triple integrals. More importantly the ideas are essential when defining and discussing surface integrals!
The function \(g\) in the above formula transforms the interval \([a,b]\) into another interval, hence the different limits. When looking at double integrals this corresponds to a deformation of the domain \(D\text{,}\) over which we integrate our function, as shown in Figure 5.15.
The function deforming one domain into the other is a vector valued function, taking a point \((y_1,y_2)\) to the point \(x_1=g_1(y_1,y_2)\) and \(x_2=g_2(y_1,y_2)\text{.}\) We assume that
in \(D\) as done in the construction of the double integral in Section 5.1. We want to estimate the area of its image \(\vect g(R)\text{.}\) The rectangle and its image are shown in Figure 5.16.
We assume that \(\vect g\) has continuous first order derivatives on \(D\text{.}\) For fixed \(y_2\) the image of the map \(y_1\to\vect g(y_1,y_2)\) is a curve containing the lower edge of \(\vect g(R)\text{.}\) According to Remark 4.14 the length of that lower edge is approximately the length of the vector
The surface area of \(\vect g(R)\) is therefore approximately the surface area of the parallelogram spanned by \(\vect v_1\) and \(\vect v_2\text{.}\) In Theorem 1.17 we saw that the
\begin{equation*}
\text{area of the parallelogram spanned by }\vect v_1\text{ and }\vect v_2
=
\biggl|\det
\begin{bmatrix}
\vect v_1 \amp \vect v_2
\end{bmatrix}
\biggr|\text{.}
\end{equation*}
Using the definition of \(\vect v_1\text{,}\)\(\vect v_2\) and the properties of the determinant we have
where \(J_{\vect g}(\vect y)\) is the Jacobian matrix of \(\vect g\) at \(\vect y\) as introduced in Definition 4.18. Hence the
\begin{align}
\text{area of the parallelogram spanned by }\amp\vect v_1\text{ and }\vect v_2\notag\\
\amp=\bigl|\det\bigl(J_{\vect g}(\vect y)\bigr)\bigr|
\Delta y_1\Delta y_2\text{.}\tag{5.6}
\end{align}
Intuitively, \(\bigl|\det\bigl(J_{\vect g}(\vect y)\bigr)\bigr|\) is the factor by which the area of a small rectangle \(R\) is distorted by the map \(\vect g\text{.}\)
Definition5.17.Jacobian determinant.
The determinant of the Jacobian matrix, \(\det\bigl(J_{\vect g}(\vect y)\bigr)\text{,}\) is called the Jacobian determinant or simply the Jacobian of \(\vect g\) at \(\vect y\text{.}\)
Remark5.18.
In the more traditional literature the Jacobian determinant is often denoted by
Now we partition \(D\) into small rectangles. Let us denote the collection of rectangles covering \(D\) by \(\mathcal R\text{.}\) If \(\vect y\) denotes the left lower corner of each \(R\in\mathcal R\) the sum
is an approximation for the volume of the region between \(\vect g(D)\) and the graph of \(f\text{.}\) If we replace \(\area(\vect g(R))\) by the approximation (5.6) this volume is approximately
The last expression is a Riemann sum for the function \(\vect y\mapsto f(\vect g(\vect y))\bigl|\det\bigl(J_{\vect g}(\vect y)\bigr)\bigr|\text{.}\) Passing to the limit this suggests that the volume of the region between \(\vect g(D)\) and the graph of \(f\) is given by
and so must be equal to the previous integral. The above procedure is not a proof, but with some effort all arguments can be made rigorous. In contrast to (5.5) we need that \(\vect g\) is one-to-one. The reason is that double integrals are not `oriented.' Hence we have the following generalisation of the substitution formula, called transformation formula or area formula for double integrals.
Theorem5.19.Transformation formula.
Suppose that \(D\subset\mathbb R^2\) is a closed set on which the double integral for every continuous function is well defined. Assume that \(\vect g\colon D\to\mathbb R^2\) is a one-to-one function with continuous first order derivatives. Then for every continuous function \(f\colon\vect g(D)\to\mathbb R\) we have
where \(x_1,x_2\) are considered to be functions of \(y_1\) and \(y_2\text{.}\)
Example5.21.Transformation formula for an affine map.
Let us write down the transformation formula if \(\vect g\) is an affine map, that is, a linear map up to a translation. If \(\vect a\) is a vector and \(A\) an invertible \(2\times 2\)-matrix, then the map
\begin{equation*}
\vect g(\vect y):=\vect a+A\vect y
\end{equation*}
is an affine map. Then (check this as an exercise), \(J_{\vect g}(\vect y)=A\) for all \(\vect y\text{.}\) Hence the Jacobian determinant is given by \(\det J_{\vect g}(\vect y)=\det A\text{.}\) As \(\det A\) is a constant the transformation formula reduces to