Section 3.1 Sequences of Vectors
Given vectors and in we say that converges to as goes to infinity if all components of converge to the corresponding component of In symbols
As in case of sequences of numbers if the limit exists. If a sequence of real numbers converges to then we know that and vice versa. A similar fact is true for sequences of vectors as the following proposition shows.
Proof.
By definition of the norm we have
Now assume that Observe that every term in the sum on the right hand side of (3.2) is non-negative. Hence
for every By assumption and thus by the “squeezing lemma” for all
This shows that thus for all as required.
As for sequences in we can give an -characterisation of convergence. It can also be used as a definition of convergence of a sequence. The proof is similar to the proof of the above proposition and left as an exercise.
Proposition 3.2.
Limits of vectors have the same properties as limits of sequences of real numbers.
Proposition 3.3.
Suppose that are sequences in with limits and respectively. Moreover, assume that is a sequence in with limit Then
- If
then
Proof.
The proof follows directly from the properties of sequences in and the definition of the multiplication by scalars, the scalar and the cross product.
Example 3.4.
Solution.
We must find the limit of every component. We have
Hence
Example 3.5.
Find the limit of
Solution.
We again have to check whether every component converges. This is not the case for the present sequence as does not converge. Hence the sequence does not converge.
Example 3.6.
Solution.
We must find the limit of every component. We have
Hence